Duncan Lewis: Deals with Sensitive and Understanding Manner!

Friday, November 26, 2010

Duncan Lewis: Deals with Sensitive and Understanding Manner!

Duncan Lewis child abduction lawyers are specialists in family law and child care advocacy as well as offering a range of service from convincing to personal injury. The aim is to provide expert child care law advice and representation to enable clients to be sure of their rights and help them reach a fair settlement. Duncan Lewis professional, yet personal service is tailored to meet the needs of individual clients and to provide sensible solutions to family and child problems. London based child custody lawyers experience enables the firm to minimise conflict wherever possible and to work with clients to achieve the best possible outcome.

Child care proceedings consist of cases where the local authority/social services have become involved when they have become concerned that a child may be at risk of harm. The team of child care law firm can advise on all aspects of care law from the initial involvement of social services to court applications for care orders, supervision orders, adoption or any other related matter. Duncan Lewis child abduction lawyers always advance the interests of children. The firm strongly believe in helping parents in order to focus on their children's emotional well-being.

No comments:

Family Procedure Rules 2010: A summary of the impact for Children’s Law Practitioners.

On 6th April the Family Procedure Rules 2010 came into effect. These rules encompass all courts from the Family Proceedings Court to the High Court Family Division and all family proceedings. As a consequence there is no longer a need to cross refer between rules such as the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989) Rules 1991 or the County Court Rules 1981. The purpose of the rules is to produce a set of Rules which are both comprehensive and comprehensible to both professionally qualified and lay court users. The Rules are supplemented by Practice Directions issued by the President of the Family Division. The number of each Practice Direction coincides with the Part of the Family Procedure Rules to which it relates. For example, Part 12 deals with proceedings relating to children (excluding adoption) and Practice Directions 12A to 12P are the accompanying Practice Directions. In some circumstances practitioners will need to pay more attention to the Practice Directions than the particular rule. The Rules therefore tell you what to do and the accompanying Practice Directions tell you how to do it. There is also an extensive suit of forms accompanying the Rules. THE RULES The Rules are subject to an overriding objective. This is a mechanism in order to deal with cases justly, having regard to any welfare issues involved. Part 1 of the Rules outlines the overriding objective as: (2) Dealing with a case justly includes, so far as is practicable – (a) ensuring that it is dealt with expeditiously and fairly; (b) dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate to the nature, importance and complexity of the issues; (c) ensuring that the parties are on an equal footing; (d) saving expense; and (e) allotting to it an appropriate share of the court's resources, while taking into account the need to allot resources to other cases." For Children’s Law Practitioners the impact of the Rules means there is one set of Rules applying to all proceedings concerning children in the Family Proceedings Court, the County Court and the High Court. The Rules provide detailed provisions about the court's general case management powers and the implementation of the Pre-Application Protocol. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION The Court must consider at every stage of the proceedings whether ADR is appropriate and can adjourn the proceedings at any stage in order to enable the parties to engage in ADR. The provisions of Part 3 of the Rules and the issue of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) are very important. Practice Direction 3 contains the pre-application protocol on Mediation Information and Assessment. This in effect initiates ADR prior to the commencement of proceedings. Whilst the Legal Services Commission has previously tried to make consideration of ADR a pre-requisite of applying for public funding the protocol brings this into courts domain at the pre-proceedings stage. As stated in the Practice Direction the rationale is to acknowledge that an adversarial court process is not always best-suited to the resolution of family disputes, particularly private law disputes relating to children. The Practice Direction sets out best practice to be followed by any person who is considering making an application to court for an order in relevant family proceedings. Relevant family proceedings are defined in Annex B of the PD and include most private law applications except emergency applications and applications for enforcement orders. The Pre-Action Protocol itself is set out in Annex A. Applicants will be expected to contact a family mediator to arrange the attendance at an information meeting about mediation or other forms of ADR. In the Protocol this is referred to as a "Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting". The Applicant has to provide the mediator with the contact details of the prospective Respondent so that that party can also be invited to attend a meeting .The Respondent will be invited, if they agree, to either a joint meeting if appropriate or a separate meeting. Paragraph 8 of the Protocol states that if after complying with the Protocol any application is made to the court, the Applicant should at the same time file a completed Family Mediation Information and Assessment Form or FM1 confirming attendance at a Mediation Information and Assessment meeting or giving reasons for not having attended such a meeting. COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS AND SERVICE Part 5 of the Rules deals with the commencement of proceedings and Practice Direction 5 A lists the individual forms required for each type of application. The requirements for service are addressed in Part 6 of the Rules and by Practice Direction 6A, 6B and 6C. The methods of service are outlined at Rule 6.23 which includes service by electronic mail if this is agreed. Any agreement to accept service by electronic mail must have been agreed in writing by the receiving party to be effective and may be limited by the recipient in respect of the format and size of attached documents (PD 6A paras 4.1-4.4). CHILDREN'S PROCEEDINGS There is no substantial change to procedures in either Care or Private law children's proceedings. However, practitioners specialising in proceedings which relate to children and their welfare will be primarily concerned with the provisions of Parts 12 and 14 of the Rules. Part 12 deals with Emergency Protection Orders, Section 8 and Section 31 applications, child abduction application and other Hague Convention applications. Part 14 outlines the procedures in relation to adoption. As far as procedures are concerned there are no substantial changes. The requirements for the service of applications and documents are set out in detail in Practice Direction 12 C. STATEMENT OF TRUTH Part 17 of the Rules outlines the documents which must be verified by a Statement of Truth. Therefore all statements of case, witness statements and applications to the court must contain a statement by the parties that they believe the facts they have set out to be true. The consequence of not including a Statement of Truth in a Statement of case or a witness statement is that a party who adduces it cannot rely upon its contents unless the court allows that party to do so. The form or wording of a Statement of Truth is set out in Practice Direction 17 A 2.1 to 2.3. CONDUCT OF HEARINGS In relation to the conduct of hearings Part 22 sets out the powers of the court to control the way in which evidence is given. Rule 22.1 expressly sets this out: "The court may control the evidence by giving directions as to a)the issues on which it requires evidence; b)the nature of the evidence which it requires to decide those issues; and c)the way in which the evidence is to be placed before the court." Part 22.2 effectively restricts the giving of oral evidence to final hearings. Witnesses' evidence at interim hearings should be proved by their written evidence. However, this restriction on the use of oral evidence at interim hearings does not apply to secure accommodation applications or interim care and supervision applications (Part 22.2.(2)). Additionally, where an enactment provides for the giving of oral evidence at an interim stage then the rules do not apply. APPEALS The Rules provide the harmonisation of appeal procedures for all level of courts, therefore from the Family Procedure Courts to the High Court. Part 30 and Practice Direction 30 A set out the routes of appeal, namely that appeals from District Judges in either the family proceedings court or the county court are to a Circuit Judge. However an appeal from a District Judge of the Principal Registry is to a High Court Judge. The general time limit for serving notice of appeal is 21 days. However if the appeal is from the decision of the family proceedings court to make an interim care order under section 38 (1) of the Children Act, then the limit is 7 days (Part 30.4 (3)). The Rules make an effort to use plain language, therefore a party seeks permission, rather than leave, to appeal. It is essential that practitioners who seek to appeal a decision comply with both the Rules set out in Part 30 but more importantly the procedures set out in Practice Direction 30A. TRANSITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS Practice Direction 36 A outlines the transitional arrangements .The general scheme is to apply the new Rules to existing proceedings, therefore those commenced before 6th April 2011. Where this is not practicable then the previous applicable rules apply. If in existing proceedings a step has been taken under the old rules any response should also be taken under the old rules. If a step is taken in existing proceedings but occurs after 6th April, then the new rules apply. CONCLUSION The new Rules therefore do not change the substantive law as that was never the intention of the Family Procedure Rule Committee and such change is reserved for Parliament. The intention was to provide an accessible source for all court users, from the qualified lawyers to the litigants in person. The Overriding Objective as outlined in Part 1of the Rules is to try and ensure that cases are dealt with 'justly, having regard to any welfare issues involved'. The Rules are designed to assist all parties in achieving that aim. The overriding objective applies to all existing proceedings from the implementation of the rules on 6th April 2011.

Duncan Lewis UK Lawyers | Legal Aid | Child Care Law | Solicitors London

Friday, November 26, 2010

Duncan Lewis: Deals with Sensitive and Understanding Manner!

No comments:

Post a Comment